Latest Update on PACE in New Jersey

NJ Assemblyman Raj Mukherji

In July the NJ Assembly passed A2374 (available here) by a vote of 68 to 6. The bill, sponsored by Assemblyman Raj Mukherji (Hudson) and Assemblywoman Nancy Pinkin (Middlesex), essentially rewrites the existing (and nonfunctioning) PACE statute of 2011 (PL 2011, ch. 187) to provide the key elements needed by industry to attract the capital providers to fund transactions in the state:

  1. The use of direct private financing as well as bonds
  2. Senior lender consent is required
  3. There will be a standardized state-wide commercial program, Garden State PACE, run by the New Jersey Economic Development Authority (NJEDA), which will establish guidelines and regulations for local programs

NJ Assemblywoman Nancy Pinkin

In addition, the bill states that municipalities can also create their own programs, as long as they conform to the NJEDA’s rules.

The passage of this bill, hammered out with the industry, is a major step forward, but the Senate version appears to be held up by the Murphy Administration’s concerns about the possible creation of independent municipal programs.

We at New Jersey PACE strongly urge the Senate and the Administration to move forward to get C-PACE passed and signed into law this year. It will still take the NJEDA and local municipalities several months to approve the regulations and ordinances needed to establish viable local programs through which projects can actually be financed.

A-2374 is a sound and well-thought-out bill, which we as an independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit fully support. Here are the key points:

  • The option for local municipalities to establish their own programs still requires them to opt into the NJEDA program and follow its rules. The evidence from other states is that more options actually serve to expand the market. If the state program works smoothly and is efficient and affordable, great; if not, there would still be a way to get projects done.
  • In addition, we would urge the NJEDA to collaborate with any interested municipalities in developing their own programs, rather than mainly seeking to regulate or control them
  • The legislation includes fees for the Authority to operate its own program
  • Guidelines can be issued immediately (or not later than six months after the passage of the bill) and can later be amended or updated by the Authority at any time, so that should not be a cause for concern; there will certainly be continuous stakeholder involvement in the program once it gets started

The bill has already received support from the NJ Sierra Club, EnvironmentNJ, and the League of Conservation Voters, and we believe that now is the right time to finally get it done.

There’s a lot of money out there looking to be put to a meaningful, reliable, and ultimately profitable use. If we’re looking not for a return to the old normal, but rather for an accelerated transition to the new economy, PACE is a win-win-win model that should be a no-brainer for property owners, lenders, legislators, and policymakers to embrace wholeheartedly, and the sooner the better.

Jonathan Cloud, Executive Director

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

68 − = 64

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.